Researchers should be free to pursue lines of inquiry and the communication of knowledge and ideas without fear of repression or censorship. At the same time, they have the ethical obligation to ...
Each round of ethical review takes an average of 4 weeks; please plan accordingly. The vast majority of research ethics submissions go through at least two sets of ethical reviews before receiving REB ...
A new study highlights key challenges and tensions in research ethics, particularly in light of emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence, and calls for the adoption of new research ethics ...
Incorporating ethics in the PGT curriculum to support students in thinking about ethics throughout their research. Integrating research ethics into more areas of teaching will help students think ...
This is a guiding document for obtaining research ethics approval for TILT projects at SFU that involve human participants. Although it has been reviewed and revised by multiple stakeholders, please ...
Our work stemmed from what was set out as a simple question asked in a University Research Ethics Committee (UREC) meeting about whether it was appropriate to include a question on equality, diversity ...
The committee membership has been developed to ensure that student projects are reviewed by staff who have an understanding of the place of these projects in the overall learning and teaching context ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results