This history of the Indian judiciary and Supreme Court is marked by several landmark judgments that reinforced the notion of constitutional morality, entrenched and strengthened fundamental rights and ...

His views were contested by senior advocate Kapil Sibal, who said so long as the institutional system of checks and balance was in place, fundamental rights were safe and secure The Tribune, now ...

Judges should not hesitate to take the right decision even if it can cost their elevation or displease those in power, ...

Justice B V Nagarathna said judges must follow their oath of office despite career consequences and cautioned against erosion of personal liberty under the guise of public interest ...

On 27th February 1967, a majority in a 11-judge bench of the Supreme Court declared that Parliament could amend Fundamental Rights. The verdict’s significance lay in the role it played in the ...

Justice B V Nagarathna, a Supreme Court judge, emphasized the importance of judicial independence and adherence to the oath of office despite potential career repercussions. She highlighted the role ...

The Constitution of India enshrines a vision of justice — social, economic, and political — and a commitment to equality in status and opportunity. But history has shown us that these ideals are often ...

Recently, a constitutional debate of immense significance has been taking place among local legal experts in the media. Retired Federal Court judges have also chimed in, forcefully expressing ...

Referring to the recent remarks of former Supreme Court judge Rohinton Nariman at an event on the basic structure doctrine, the vice president said its impregnability was demolished to 'pieces' by the ...

Organised by Jyot in collaboration with the college, the event featured Jainacharya Yugbhushan Suri, the 79th successor of Tirthankar Mahavir, offering a confluence of spiritual and legal discourse.

COMMENT | Let it be said at the outset that disagreement over the correct interpretation of the law is lauded, even encouraged, in a democratic society. However, such disagreement must be ...